Pages

Monday, February 14, 2011

Ninth vs. Tenth

The tenth was my first doctor.  My introduction to Doctor Who was, well, sporadic.  My parents started watching it about a year ago, which meant that whenever I was home I saw an episode or two.  I ended up seeing about 15 episodes, weeks or months apart, completely out of order, but all from seasons 3 through 5 (aside from the Christmas specials, which I'd seen all of).

Over the Christmas break, between the usual amounts of pre-recorded episodes that I watched with my parents, and the Christmas special marathon, I more than doubled the total number of episodes I had seen, and finally hit the point of needing to actually watch the show.

So as of January, I started watching it, from the beginning.  Having only really seen seasons 3 through 5 meant that I'd seen a fair bit of David Tennant and a few episodes with Matt Smith, but never Christopher Eccleston.  Not a single episode.

I was really iffy about him at first.  I feel like the ninth doctor is more different from the tenth and the eleventh than those two are from each other, although I probably haven’t really seen enough of the eleventh to make that judgement.  It took me quite a few episodes to come around to the ninth, but when I finally did, I really came around to him.  I loved the ninth  doctor. 

By the time I finished the first season, I had become rather attached to him.  I knew that the doctor regenerated in the season finale, and I didn't want him to.  I found myself thinking that I would gladly trade off one season of David Tennant to have another one of Christopher Eccleston.  I cried when he regenerated. 

But then David Tennant was there.  And I like David Tennant.  I couldn't imagine what would possibly have made me be willing to give up one of his seasons; he was clearly totally great and should have been the doctor forever and ever.  Who cared about Christopher Eccleston?

Basically, I am really fickle, and both of them were great in very different ways.

No comments:

Post a Comment